In my novel One Amazing Thing, nine
characters are trapped by an earthquake in the
basement of a high-rise building. When they
realize there’s no escape, they begin in their
panic to lash out at one another. After a bad
fight that brings down chunks of the ceiling, a
student named Uma urges them to focus their
energies on something positive by each sharing
a story from their lives, something they’ve
never told anyone. When one of the other
women protests, saying she doesn’t have a
story, Uma insists that everyone has at least
“one amazing thing.”
I, too, believe that we all have stories,
wonderful, amazing ones floating around us—or
even inside us—like magical spores. I have long
relied on “found” stories—or snippets of them—
to create my fiction. I’m not alone in this. Most
of us bump up against amazing things more
often than we realize. If we can remain in a
state of openness, ready for the great story that
might come to us any moment, and if we can
learn to identify these moments of power, we’re
off to a great start. But how to transform these
moments into successful fiction? To create
stories that are ours , that ring with authenticity,
that have personal depth—but that are not
restricted by the autobiographical? I’m going to
share with you three techniques that have
worked for me.
—by Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni
1. Meld disparate experiences into an
unlikely fictional unit.
Sometime back, while on a visit to Kolkata, the
Indian city of my birth, I went to see a friend in
the old, northern part of the city. As we were
chatting over tea, I heard a series of explosions.
My friend explained that the old Chatterjee
mansion on the corner was being demolished,
to be replaced by an apartment complex. We
went to the balcony to look at this beautiful,
dilapidated home, with its aged marble exterior
and its green-shuttered, floor-length windows.
Even as we watched, a wrecking ball shattered
a wall. Generations of families—grandparents,
parents, widowed aunts, married sons with
their wives and offspring—had loved and
quarreled and outsmarted one another in that
house. Its demise signaled the end of a way of
life.
That night I lay in bed and imagined residing
within such an orthodox home as a girl. What
would I have loved? How might I have felt
restricted? What might have caused me to
rebel? A single protagonist alone could not
express all the reactions one could have to this
world-within-a-world, filled with traditions and
secrets. What if there was another girl, a
cousin? What if she responded vastly differently
to the same rules? What if she discovered a
secret too terrible to tell her beloved cousin?
These what-ifs (crucial to the writing process)
fired up my imagination. I didn’t get any sleep
that night, but by the time the hawkers on the
street below started calling out their wares, I
had the idea for my novel Sister of My Heart .
During the rest of my visit, I went to as many
old homes as I could. I mystified relatives by
asking to see prayer rooms or storage areas
under the stairs or old-style bathrooms with
claw-footed tubs. I stood on terraces and
recalled the games my cousins and I used to
play. I looked down on the street below and
tried to imagine how a young woman, restricted
by orthodoxy, might feel as she viewed life
passing her by. But in spite of all my field
research, I still didn’t feel ready to write the
novel. Something was missing, something
pungent and powerful, a conflict that would
impel the story forward.
Back in the U.S., I continued searching for that
missing something in newspapers, in
magazines, in my daily interactions with
people. A frustrating year passed. Then one
day I came across a TV program that
discussed the problem of fetal sex selection, a
significant issue in India that had troubled me
in the past. Pregnant women (often coerced by
their in-laws) would go to prenatal centers to
learn the sex of the unborn child. If the fetus
was a girl, it would often be aborted. As I
watched the grainy footage of dimly lit centers
where women kept their faces averted, I began
to imagine those faces—and how the women
they belonged to might have felt. In my mind,
suddenly, a face came into clearer focus: that
of one of the cousins in Sister of My Heart.
What would happen if she found herself in such
a clinic? Who could she turn to? If her only
choices were to have the abortion or to walk
out of the marriage, what would she do? And,
just like that, the missing chunk of the plot fell
into place. Two very disparate experiences
from my life, one personal and emotional, one
objective and intellectual, had merged into an
unlikely fictional unit.
To take one personal experience that is
meaningful to you and let it inspire or inform
your work can be powerful. To translate more
than one of them into a single work can be
exponentially more so. After all, while you will
likely come across many people who can relate
firsthand to any one of your life’s experiences,
only you have lived them all. Find innovative
ways to revisit and reinvent these meaningful
moments in your fiction, and you quite literally
will be writing the story that only you can write.
2. Take sides—against yourself.
Sometime before I wrote “Mrs. Dutta Writes a
Letter,” now my most anthologized short story,
I had become aware of a growing problem in
my community: the reluctant immigration of
aging parents to the U.S. from India. Deprived
of their familiar support systems, these
immigrants did poorly in their new environment,
often becoming depressed or ill. The issue
made me uncomfortable. I knew I’d face a
similar situation soon—my own widowed
mother in India no longer had immediate family
there. Indeed, a few months later, she came to
our home on an extended visit.
It was not a success. My mother found it
difficult to adjust and resented being expected
to change lifelong habits at her age. She was
bored and lonely when my husband and I went
to work—and sad, though I didn’t realize it
then.
I, too, was full of resentment. My life was
disrupted by her demands. In addition to my
work responsibilities, I ran around doing things
for her all day—or so it seemed. By evening, I
was too exhausted to even think of writing.
Worst of all, nothing I did made her happy.
When she returned to India, declaring that she
would rather die there than live here, I felt both
angered and guilty.
To heal myself, I decided to write a story about
the experience. I had an arsenal of details: How
my mother would criticize me for asking my
husband to share the household chores. How
she would rise before dawn and clatter around
the house, waking us all. How she refused to
use the washer and dryer and would instead
drape her hand-washed saris over the
backyard fence, so that I lived in fear of
complaints from our neighbors.
But the more I dwelled on these facts, the
worse I felt—not just as a person but as an
artist. The characters in my story were wooden
and unsympathetic. The mother was a
harridan. The daughter was self-righteous and
whiny. I threw away draft after draft in
frustration. But I had to write this story! Go
where the pain is , a writing teacher had once
told me, and I knew from experience that she
was right.
I finally realized that the story wasn’t working
because I had an agenda: to prove that I (thinly
disguised as the fictional daughter) was a good
person who had done her best with her
unreasonable mother, the story’s villain. But in
doing this, I was misusing the story form.
Stories are for understanding the nuances of
life, for empathizing with characters in spite of—
or perhaps because of—their exasperating
frailty. If I wanted my story to succeed, I had to
give up my identification with the daughter and
become the opponent.
It was when I made old Mrs. Dutta the point-
of-view character that the story came together.
It wasn’t easy. But I forced myself to plunge
into her homesickness for India. I finally began
to feel her loneliness, her bafflement at being
trapped in a country where the rules had
changed overnight. And the story came to life. I
understood this, too: The story did not need a
villain; most stories don’t. Mrs. Dutta’s
situation was compelling enough by itself.
Your real-life conflicts are full of riches to be
mined for your fiction. After all, conflict is what
drives plot. But you may find, as I did, that
you’re too close to the subject matter of your
life’s battles to achieve the objectivity you need
to tell the story with the complexity it deserves.
Try stepping into your adversary’s shoes with
honest empathy, and you may find the fresh
perspective your story needs.
3. Use your secret expertise.
When I was planning my first novel, I knew I
wanted it to be about immigrant life in America,
its challenges and joys. The subject fascinated
me because I was living it myself; it surrounded
me on every side in my Indian-American
community. But I didn’t want a realistic
documentation of daily life to portray the ways
in which we were changing America and being
transformed by it. I’d already done that in my
debut collection of stories, Arranged Marriage .
This time I wanted something unusual and
unexpected, something to astonish readers into
delight and attention.
The answer came to me one day when I was
cooking. As I opened the steel container that
held my spices and their pungent smells rose
up to greet me, I thought of how recipes
containing them had been passed down
through generations of my family—not just to
gratify the palate, but for their medicinal
properties and lucky powers. I knew that
turmeric was a germ killer that could be
smeared on fish to preserve it until frying time.
Considered sacred, it was also used in prayer
ceremonies. Fenugreek soaked in water
soothed stomach ailments. Red pepper thinned
the blood, mitigated colds and guarded against
the evil eye. All of this was common knowledge
in my ancestral village. But here in America, this
information was rare, even exotic. What if I
created a character who truly understood
spices? Who had studied them all her life and
now used her knowledge to help her
community? Where would I place her?
It came to me that one of the most magical
places I have encountered in this country is the
Indian grocery store. Stepping into one is like
stepping into a separate world. The shadowy
aisles are crowded with mysterious substances
—mysterious, that is, unless you possess a
special knowledge. I visualized a woman
walking the aisles, plunging her arm into a bin
of coriander, tucking a stick of cinnamon into a
lonely customer’s turban to bring him friends.
That was how the idea, protagonist and setting
for my first novel came to me: Tilo, the owner of
the spice store, had special powers. She could
look into her customers’ hearts; she could
commune with the spices and ask them to do
her bidding; in exchange for this power, she had
promised never to fall in love. Suddenly I could
see the plot structure: Many people would
come to Tilo for assistance, and their problems
would help the reader understand the
immigrant community. I also had my conflict:
Tilo would fall in love with one of the customers
and be forced to choose between her power to
do good and the love she craved. The resulting
novel, The Mistress of Spices , became a
bestseller.
The things that are second nature to you, or
that have fascinated you since childhood, can
be some of your most authentic, amazing
things—and yet authors often overlook them,
hidden in plain sight. In fact, drawing on your
secret expertise is perhaps the most natural
way of all to write what you know.
These techniques have helped me take the raw
material of my life and shape it into fiction that
no one else could have written. I am confident
that if you experiment with them, you will be
equally pleased with the results.